Chiropractors: Redefining ‘Cure’ (Feedback)

15 04 2010

I haven’t completed my chiropractor survey yet, but something I’m running into are chiropractors or assistants claiming they can ‘extend my life expectancy’. Some even say this can happen until I die of natural causes as an old woman. So, the question is, what exactly is a cure? Do these claims count as chiropractors claiming they can cure AIDS through chakra realignment and proper flow of energy through spinal manipulation? In my opinion they’re giving the impression they can while covering their bottoms legally. I’m just wondering whether to count these as hits or misses. Feedback is definitely necessary.

Quack





Chiropractor Cure-Alls

13 04 2010

What percentage of chiropractors listed in the phone book will claim they can cure AIDS? We’re doing the research. What’s your guess?

Quack





Where do you stand?

12 11 2009

Do you think that critical thinking is more important than atheism? Do you believe critical thinking is the root of atheism? I’m interested in hearing your opinions as I’ve seen so many differing ones. Which is fundamentally more important or is it a false dichotomy? I want you to be the judge.





TAM 7

10 03 2009

I’m going this year thanks to a shady cabal and a scholarship. For those of you who aren’t in the know, TAM stands for The Amaz!ng Meeting and is hosted by the James Randi Educational Foundation. I wanted to go desperately but figured I’d have to wait for next year when a sponsorship landed on my proverbial doorstep. TAM is a great way to meet fellow skeptics and see a wealth of prominent presenters all in one place. If you can afford it, go. If you can’t, apply for a scholarship. For those of you with plans on going, I’ll see you there.

And now a word to my sponsors:





A Skeptical Interview with Derek Colanduno

6 03 2009

Derek Colanduno is the co-host of the amazing hit podcast Skepticality. He and Swoopy interviewed me a few months ago and now it’s my turn to interview him!

Kate: So, the first question I ask everyone: When did you first realize you were a skeptic?

Derek: Well, my dad was always a hard-ass about questioning everything, he was almost Dawkins in a way. He had the ‘luxury’ of being sent to one of those old-school Catholic schools when he was younger. That embittered him to religion and in-turn led to his ability to naturally question almost everything. When *I* didn’t display those traits, he kind of corrected that in me. I never knew there was a ‘word’ for it until I grabbed my first Skeptic Magazine, which I purchased due to the main article contents, which were all about Carl Sagan… I still have a few copies of that exact issue. Right there in the front of the magazine, it spells out what a Skeptic is. So, either I have always been one, just didn’t know the word for it until then. Or… I am brand new… ;)

Kate: Ha, I wouldn’t say you’re brand new at all. How old were you when you picked up that first Skeptic Magazine?

Derek: I was probably around 24-25.

Kate: And were you a fan of Carl Sagan before picking up that first magazine?

Derek: I had read Demon Haunted World when I was in college, it came out around that time. I have ALWAYS been fascinated with Religion and its effects on people and the world, still am. As most kids at the age I was, I searched a bit to see if any form of religion ‘fit’ me. None really did, I kind of hated rituals and religious traditions the way most all organized religions say they should be done. So, that book spoke to me. When I saw the Skeptic Magazine with Carl on the cover, I wanted to read it…

Kate: I think it’s great that your foray into skepticism involved Skeptic Magazine with which your podcast is now affiliated. Skepticality was the first major podcast of its kind. How and when did you decide to become involved?

Derek: With Skeptic Magazine?

Kate: And with podcasting. How did it all come together?

Derek: Ok, podcasting was just me wanting to do what I always wanted to do. Back in college I worked for old-school over the air radio doing engineering and also on-air DJ work. I worked as the engineer for National Sports Radio Network, (which I think was bought by ESPN), and also one of the last privately held Rock stations left, which was an Alterative Rock Station doing late night on-air stuff now and then as a fill-in. Swoopy would come to the studio back then and we’d like to toss on music WE liked, since it was the middle of the night and the boss types were all long asleep. So, when we heard about Podcasting… we had that moment of… “HEY we can do the show we ALWAYS wanted to do!”. And since we had tons of Audio/Video equipment already, it was easy to start doing it.

Kate: And the show you always wanted to do had to do with skeptical issues, I take it? How did you become involved with Skeptic?

Derek: Skeptic Magazine happened out of sheer amazement. Dr. Shermer has always been my favorite of the ‘Skeptics’ I knew of. Mainly because I like his style. I have never been really ‘religious’ as he was, but I understand why people are. And his way of dealing with the borderlands between hard core religion and atheism has a very delicate touch which I think allows it to be absorbed by more people. When I first got home from the hospital, Dan Loxton contacted Swoopy and told us Skeptic wanted us to be their official podcast… the rest is history. As for the radio show…. the Skeptical issues wasn’t really thing, more the stuff that ARE skeptical issues, but back then, we didn’t really know much about the ‘Skeptic’ movement or the identification with the word. But, yes, what we WANTED to talk about is pretty much what Skepticality is now.

Kate: That’s amazing. Speaking of the now-widespread ‘skeptic movement’, it seems to be a relatively new phenomenon. Do you think you had a hand in promoting it?

Derek: I am not sure really. Once we started our show, we were shocked at how many groups there were out there. We knew about the JREF, and CFI (CSICOP), but had no idea just how many other groups there really were. So, I don’t know how much of a hand we had in ‘growing’ it, as much as giving people who were content that no one else was giving them.

Kate: So you basically gave other skeptics an alternative platform to get their messages out?

Derek: Maybe, but more to the point that it gave people who thought like us an alternative to what seems to be the mainstream of talk radio, or big media. Something that would speak to people who have always wanted to hear about the information/issues they identify with. That and … the world needs more critical thinking in terms of history and science. And that was a big goal of our show when we started.

Kate: And it’s an admirable goal. On to another question I ask everyone: Would you define yourself as an atheist?

Derek: There is one. I guess I am. I just don’t like labels like that. Some people disagree with me, but I think putting even Atheists into a ‘group’ turns it into its own form of religion, which is kind of anti what most Atheists I know are. I always say I am a “I don’t care ist” Because, just being anti-religion doesn’t gain you much ground in the public discourse, and being against everything shuts down 95% the people from wanting to even listen to you, or look at your opions objectively. Which is a terrible thing about people in general. It is sad that even the whole concept of ‘Agnostic’ is rife with issues all its own, mostly based on ignorance and misuse of the word over time. I fear that this response doesn’t even answer your question! :) If I was going to claim anything, I can claim ‘Humanist’.

Kate: I understand your concerns. One of my goals is to ‘take back’ the word ‘atheist’ and redefine it in a more positive light because, in the end, all it means is a lack of a belief in a god.

Derek: Or… gods… :) I just don’t believe in any ‘supernatural’ anything. Because if something happens, it happens or it doesn’t. If it happened, it was natural. Or it didn’t, therefore it would be, well nothing. Sadly, I feel much the same about the nonsense of ‘Organic’ food, and ‘all natural’ beef. I mean, aren’t all vegetables ‘organic’, if they weren’t they would be, well … something else. They rot, they are plant material, etc…. Definitions sometimes get Skeptics and Critical thinkers in a bind.

Kate: I know what you mean, and I’m not going to shell out an extra 5 bucks for tomatoes because they’re labeled ‘organic’.

Derek: Sadly, many people will. Next time you are in a store with a big produce section. Pay attention to the many stupid little labels there are to brand stuff with strange ‘feel good’ labels. It is positively stupid. Even FISH for all that is good has different crazy labels now.

Kate: ‘Wild’ Salmon, &c.

Derek: “Farm Raised” … There are even some more strange than that.

Kate: I really just want a tasty fish. Is that too much to ask?

Derek: Exactly … And it gets even more crazy when you talk to anti-GM food people. They are just as bad as the Anti-Vax people in my opinion.

Kate: Hmmm, I don’t know. The Anti-Vax people have a good chance at destroying a good portion of the population.

Derek: Oh, yea… but, I was just referencing the Anti-Vax people since they have the same mindset as the ‘organic food’ and anti ‘Genetic Modified’ food folks. It is all the same root, people who have good intentions, but have some VERY flawed bits of knowledge which they won’t let go of.

Kate: I think a lot of bad logic stems from good intentions which is why it’s so difficult to get these people to see reason. They’re passionate about what they believe is helpful to the world.

Derek: Exactly. Which is why I like to take a very… ‘nice’ approach if I can since these people aren’t bad people, they are good people, just they completely believe wrong things. It is hard to get a hate on for someone who really just believes they are doing the right thing, if you can separate yourself from the problem. Which is VERY hard to do.

Kate: It is, and it’s why I admire people like Robert Lancaster from Stop Sylvia. He can convert the most rabid Sylvia Browne fan with his charm and general good nature. I believe it’s what we should all strive for.

Derek: Exactly, I am so glad that Robert is recovering from his stroke. What is it with us Skeptic types and the need to visit the hospital?

Kate: I know you can sympathize with him from your own experience. How has your own trauma affect you and do you see the world any differently because of it?

Derek: Physically I was a total mess when I first woke up from my coma… but, I am now almost 4 years out since it happened and with my excellent rehab program, most people who didn’t know me before, would never know that it ever happened. Now, my wife and Swoopy both always comment that I am now a much ‘nicer’ and far more patient and calm person. But, even when I was in the hospital, I was beating the Skepticality drum. Swoopy hung up all sorts of Skepticality stuff in my ICU room and handed out CD’s with some of our episodes on them so the nurses and doctors could get an idea who that sleeping guy with all the tubes and wires in him was. Which was VERY nice, since most of my rehab doctors knew me from the show, and therefore felt very comfortable being very technical and such with me. So, I knew a lot about what was going on.

Kate: That is an extreme comfort. When you look back on your experience now do you feel lucky? Bitter?

Derek: The only part I could call… ‘luck’ was where I was when the stroke started. I happened to be at dinner surrounded by friends and my wife, and Swoopy. So, lots of people there to realize something was REALLY wrong. And, if it had started only 10 mins earlier, I would have been on the road home, on the highway doing somewhat over 70 miles per hour in my truck. The rest I give all the credit to my wife, Swoopy, and my doctors.

Kate: So thanks to time and your loved ones, you’re still here. Now that you get to enjoy life, where do you see yourself in, say, 10 years?

Derek: There is a funny question, my boss asked me that last week as well… lol Well, at this point all I really think about is how much better I will be feeling and hopefully will be back to where I was just 4 years ago. I still can’t drive a car yet, and my speech is off and on. Maybe, at that point, I can really think about where I will really want to be. But right now, I am just focused on becoming what I was… more than what I will be. One step at a time type of hing I guess. :)

Kate: I do hope that you realize how amazing you are at present. I think every Skepticality fan would agree.

Derek: Well, thank you…. but you should hear me attempt to read from notes still… it is not a pretty sight! But, according to Swoopy, that was never my strong suit. I used to lecture for side money and I was NEVER able to use any form of script or such.

Kate: Well keep trucking on, Derek. You have hordes of fans out there who are pulling for you.

Derek: Thanks, I will… only way to be!

Kate: I think this is a good place to start wrapping up unless there’s anything else you’d like to cover?

Derek: Sounds good! You know where to find me if you have any extra questions… and just to remind people that we are coming up on another great year for the Skeptic Track at Dragon*Con! We have Randi, Phil Plait, and many others coming back for the fun once again!

Kate: And I’m going to be there, so everyone should definitely attend.

Derek: That is right! So, I will finally get to meet you in person as well! :)

Kate: It will be great considering we’ve now both interviewed each other!

Derek: True! Can’t wait… see you in about 6.5 months! :)

Kate: Thanks, Derek. It’s been a pleasure.





A Skeptical Interview with SGU’s Jay Novella

4 03 2009
Jay Novella

Jay Novella

Jay is a skeptical satirist who lends his unique wry perspective on all things wacky and weird. Jay can be found on the hit podcastThe Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe.

Kate: So. Jay Novella. When did you first realize you were a skeptic?

Jay: To answer your question…There are two answers. I first realized I was a skeptic as in relating the label to myself when I was about 25. Steve, Bob, Evan and Perry had decided to start a skeptical society that would send out a news letter and have meetings. Steve asked me to help…. I asked him about the idea and he explained to me the official concept. I knew what the word meant..but not what it meant to be one. The other answer is I knew I was skeptically minded since I was young…probably in my late single digits. I always asked questions

Kate: You just didn’t know there was a name for it, right?

Jay: I didn’t know that there was a group of people who held critical thinking as a philosophy. I knew of some of these people … Randi for example

Kate: Randi is fantastic. I’m a huge fan of the JREF.

Jay: Any god fearing skeptic is :-) His work has been key in moving the idea forward.

Kate: That brings up another question. There seems to be a correlation between skepticism and atheism. Would you describe yourself as an atheist?

Jay: I am agnostic..and are you sure you want to fuck with me right now?

Kate: :D Noted. And no, I can’t say I want to be on your bad side. I’ve heard about your mad ninja skills.

Jay: And bow hunting skills..highly honed. We can talk about it

Kate: People seem to define agnosticism differently. What does it mean to you to label yourself an agnostic? Has your agnosticism affected your bow hunting skills, for example?

Jay: Its pretty simple. I believe that since we can not prove that god empirically does or does not exist that I have to say its possilbe a god or gods does exist. It has only made my skills more deadly grasshopper. That is my logical answer. I have an emotional opinion as well, and this is where the arguments start.

Kate: Let it begin.

Jay: I mostly do not believe god exists meaning that I do not have faith in a gods existence. I mean…tornadoes…give me a fucking break! Kate…no way.

Kate: But tornadoes are god’s way of telling us to not live in the Midwest.

Jay: That is a point I did once consider until one came to CT. and ripped apart some serious shit. It all boils down to the unprovable belief. No one has proven that gods exist…ever.

Kate: So, if there was a god, what would that mean? God hates the Midwest and sometimes other places, too?

Jay: I think by now some dood would have stumbled upon it. Kate this isn’t going to be fun for you if you keep disagreeing with me.

Kate: I will make it a point to be a better interviewer and agree with everything you say. I can even call you ‘sir’ if you like.

Jay: only after dark..you have 1 hour.

Jay: I respect atheists and totally understand their view. And I think we can co-exist peacefully.

Kate: I agree. And not just because you threatened me.

Jay: heh..good girl.

Kate: It seems to me that the trouble isn’t between atheists and agnostics so much as is it is between anti-theists and agnostics.

Jay: That’s a good point. I find that making the issue about the existence of a god is less important than promoting critical thinking. I want to teach people how to think..not what to think.

Kate: That’s a noble goal and it’s something I strive for, myself.

Jay: Most atheists I know never contest my agnosticism and we are seamless.

Jay: And most are proud skeptics and that makes me love them.

Kate: Almost every atheist I know is a skeptic but there are also skeptics who are staunch theists. Do you feel that theists can be good skeptics when they choose to believe in something without evidence?

Jay: I think that those who are legitimate skeptics, who really do understand the scientific method and rational thinking, accept that they have faith in a god. They allow themselves to believe in spite of the lack of evidence. An individual can make it work in their mind without the two colliding and I find that very interesting.

Kate: It is interesting. The few skeptical theists I know are amazing critical thinkers. If I didn’t know them I’d say being a skeptical theist was an impossibility.

Jay: On the surface it doesn’t seem plausible but like I said, they work it out and I dont have a problem with that. Just don’t cross science with your religion and Im fine.

Kate: Regarding SGU, do you ever get hate mail from believers in the nonsense you debunk? If so, what’s the most amusing response to date?

Jay: We get them from time to time. Most of them are accusing us of being hypocrites. We had a run for awhile from the 911 truthers.

Kate: The truthers seem to be a rabid group.

Jay: I think one that stands out is some guy who got mad about me doing funny accents. He thought the accents were insulting and it would only be ok for me to make fun of my own kind.

Kate: You bastard.

Jay: I know..I’m just hell bent on destruction.

Jay: Steve’s long-term fight with Dr. Egnor of the Discovery institute is priceless. He is a total inane bozo … and I love him!

Kate: My partner-in-crime Tiana and I had a much publicized argument with Casey Luskin with the Discovery Institute. Those guys are great for a laugh.

Jay: They are a special group to us all.

Jay: We all need a foil..I just wish they didn’t dress so silly. It would be cool to have my nemesis be all dressed in black and walk around with a side kick.

Kate: Then we need to get back to the ninja topic. I think you’ve missed your calling in life.

Jay: I have been a ninja for 25 years. What the fuck are you talking about?

Kate: I hope you haven’t been a secret ninja, otherwise the jig is up.

Jay: Why the hell would any self respecting ninja hide their skills? I use them at work..on dates..at parties. I just did a flip.

Kate: That sounds like it could be disastrous. Have you ever accidentally harmed a date while trying to impress her with your skills?

Jay: I am protecting them. Sometimes destroying evil right there in the bar. It’s quite impressive.

Kate: So, do you, ah, often go on second dates after these shenanigans?

Jay: I start with the second date. It’s always better because you know the person better.

Kate: I start with the third “Let’s just sit at home” date, but that’s because I’m cheap.

Jay: You say cheap..I say a dream.

Kate: Oh, Jay. I bet you say that to all of your desperate fangirls.

Jay: Man if I can be in my underwear watching tv on the 3rd date…that is what I live for.

Kate: Please tell me you wear underoos.

Jay: The gorilla ones.

Kate: I was holding out for spiderman.

Jay: I used to wear those..but please do not confuse your underwear brands.

Kate: Oh, dear. It seems I’ve made a horrid faux pas. Can you forgive me?

Jay: Im sending you my bill.

Jay: So..outside the SGU…Kate…there is no outside the SGU.

Kate: So it’s like the Matrix?

Jay: Heh…are you trying to scare me? I’m pretty much the same guy on the show but I swear more and talk more. Steve edits out the best stuff me and Rebecca say for legal purposes.

Kate: I’m aware of the sad reality of editing. When I was on Skepticality a remark I made about a banana and Ray Comfort was edited out, probably for poor taste.

Jay: Yea..he does fuck himself with them on occasion. Hes a real class act.

Kate: And, you see, my comment was much more innocent than that. Why don’t we move on to the ‘real’ Jay instead of the SGU Jay. What is it you do for fun?

Jay: I find time to write poetry, read, and go out drinking … or stay home and drink.

Kate: All good things. I would add ‘crying into my oatmeal’ but I don’t want to be presumptuous.

Jay: I cry alot too.

Kate: Now, to get all Barbara Walters on you: What makes Jay Novella cry?

Jay: Divorce.

Kate: Divorce is a good reason to cry and I can sympathize with you considering mine came through this past November.

Jay: so you know the deal. Its terrible. I never thought it would happen to me. Im trying to turn it into a good thing. I made some mistakes that actually can help me figure myself out better. But overall…kids don’t get married unless you have been in therapy for many years.

Kate: So you’re applying your critical thinking skills to your relationships, yes?

Jay: Absolutely. You know, skepticism has helped me get through it. I really leaned on the rational part of my mind to help me understand what I was feeling.

Kate: Skepticism: There’s nothing it can’t do.

Jay: are you seducing me?

Kate: Well, I am the ‘Cuddly Atheist’. The least I can do is offer you a hug.

Jay: I’ll take 3.

Kate: Three in a row or would you like them spaced out?

Jay: How about one big one that would = 3. That way its technically 1 but I will know the truth.

Jay: I think that anything with finality gets to me.

Kate: Speaking of finality, do you struggle with the concept of death? It can be a hard issue for agnostics and atheists.

Jay: I had a very hard problem with death in my late teens- late 20s. I believe that its an incredible waste and is purposeless.

Kate: Because we’re all going to die, right?

Jay: of course
.
Kate: And we have no way of knowing how or when or what happens to us afterward (though as an atheist I believe we simply cease to exist)

Jay: The amount of time we are given seems just long enough for us to get to know ourselves. To find all the good people we want to have in our lives…and just enough time to pay off our mortgages and then whoops..you’re dead.

Kate: And that’s if you’re lucky

Jay: Think of all the things you never will get to do. I want to be good at so many things but in the end I will have to just pick a few. With nanotechnology … oh..if I get into this we will never end this interview. You know the deal. We will be able to do it. Some day some way our technology is going to kick deaths ass. Humans will get to plan on an arch to their life that spans centuries or much much longer.

Kate: But the question is, will we look hot at age 300?

Jay: I know I will. At 300 I will just be hitting my stride.

Kate: That goes without saying. But what about the less fortunate bastards out there?

Jay: Who..the French? I cant help them.

Kate: But yet you can eat their delicious cuisine. Bastard.

Jay: I do like cheeze

Kate: Going back to the future (heh), what’s the most important issue you think we’ll have to face?

Jay: For skepticism or science?

Kate: Either/or.

Jay: I think the two have similar needs. Education is key for both. In the skeptical movement we need to increase awareness by being more socially active. It’s incredible that news and information are moving to the web. It lets people like PZ Meyers, for example, not only educate his readers but also give his commentary. Another great example is the blog Science-Based Medicine. Where else could this information possibly exist and have the reach it does if not for the web? Getting the information out there, teaching people the concepts behind critical thinking, can literally change the world. It’s not going to be immediate, it’s a generational commitment that we all can add to.

Jay: Quality education of quality science is acutely important to humanity’s long-term success. We’ve reached incredibly far in the past 120 years. Compared to the last 100 years of advancement, the next 100 years could be like 20,000 years. This is because the speed of our advancement continues to increase exponentially. From the industrial revolution to today we have hit a new paradigm of knowledge. In short, we humans are awesome little creatures and we need to take very good care of ourselves. Science is the world’s biggest bowl of chicken soup … we all need to eat it and smile.

Kate: What would you like to tell all those anti-science nuts we seem to have to battle daily?

Jay: “Good… your hate has made you powerful. Now fulfill your destiny and take your father’s place at my side!”

Kate: And so we end with a Star Wars quote. Excellent.





Introducing the Southern Skeptical Society

20 02 2009

As I find myself moving back to Mississippi, I’m excited to announce a new group devoted to reason, logic and critical thinking. The group, brainchild of Brad Fusilier, announced its intention to go non-profit in order to reach as many people as possible. You can find (and join) the official Facebook group for this exciting new group here.

Remember, it’s important to support any new skeptical group, especially in the deep South where reason so often takes a back seat to dogma. I look forward to seeing where this group’s exciting future leads them.

Cuddles





Hunting Roxy

20 02 2009

A friend recently came to me distressed about a presence in her home. Being the skeptical skeptic that I am I didn’t believe what she was experiencing was paranormal but I knew her fear was authentic so I decided to investigate. I was surprised to discover upon entering her apartment that there, in plain sight, was what appeared to be some sort of entity. I got my most skeptical spirit hunting equipment out and decided I was going to meet this beast head on. Infrared night cameras? Check. Telephone to the dead? You bet. EVP monitor? Uh-huh. I was ready for this bitch.

Kate Investigates

Kate Investigates

So I turned on my radio Frank’s Box and was skeptically shocked to hear the song ‘Roxanne’. My extra skeptical deduction was that this entity could only be named Roxanne. I did some research. I left the haunted apartment and headed down to the fish market. One tosser recalled a run-in with a hooker. Her name was Shirley. Shirley died five years prior during what is commonly referred to as a ‘donkey show’. This was obviously the connection I was looking for. A song about a hooker? A fish market? A dead prostitute? Sure, the names didn’t match up but that’s a minor point.

My next investigative technique called for the use of an infrared camera in hopes of catching Roxanne on film (because we all know that ghosts only appear in the dark on extremely pixelated low-resolution media). What I discovered was shocking. Not only did we capture Roxanne in all her ghostly glory, but we also captured several orbs which, skeptically speaking, can only indicate a demonic presence. What was I to do? I had to rid my friend’s home of these menacing demons and send Roxanne up to that red light in the sky.

Crisp Cappuccino - International Psychic

Crisp Cappuccino - International Psychic

I decided to break out the big guns and called in international voice to the dead, Crisp Cappuccino. Mr. Cappuccino’s presence was such that, upon entering the haunted home, orbs began flying everywhere and the sound of ghostly screaming filled every nook and cranny. His eyes rolled back into his head as he threw his arms out, went into convulsions and squealed in a high-pitched voice, “Roxanne, go to the red light. Walk the street to heaven and go into that red light.” After Mr. Cappuccino’s fit, all was quiet. I don’t know what power gave this man his supernatural ability to send ghost hookers to heaven but I’m grateful for the chance to skeptically analyze and skeptically agree with everything that comes out of his thin-lipped mouth.

A month later, I checked back with my friend. She reported no more ghostly interference but did let me know that Mr. Cappuccino was now living in her bathtub. I’m not sure who to call about that kind of pest problem.

Skeptical Cuddles





Support Young Skeptics

28 12 2008

The Young Australian Skeptics have come out with a new podcast called The Pseudo Scientists. I had a chance to listen to their first episode and thought it entertaining. I especially liked the street interviews. One person admitted to believing in ghosts even though she hasn’t ever seen one. I suppose that’s a lot like religion, really. Tiana and I are even mentioned in a roundabout way when the podcasters discuss our Discovery Institute adventure.

It makes me exceptionally happy to see young people becoming involved in the skeptic movement so we should all be lending our support to these novice podcasters who I’m sure will become expert in no time judging by their first episode.

You can also become a fan on Facebook.





More Woo in Airports – A Movie Review

1 12 2008

Flying to Seattle from Houston last week I was given the option to watch an in-flight movie – Henry Poole is Here.  I had never heard of it before and, noticing that it had Luke Wilson in it, I decided to give it a try.  For those of you who haven’t seen it, well.  Don’t.  It goes a bit like this:

Luke Wilson is a terminally ill, curmudgeony atheist who buys a crappy stucco house out in the suburbs.  There’s a water stain on one of the walls that his Catholic neighbor swears is the face of Christ Almighty.  Then it turns into one long ‘faith is good, we need hope, atheists are horrible cynics, whaaa’ crywank.  People are healed by touching the stain (which cries blood, incidentally).  And in the end?  Wilson’s character is healed.  So I guess the moral of the story is that pareidolia leads to ridiculous characters being healed in fairly usual ways which makes everybody lead happier more mindless lives.  Huh.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.